reframe the argument

I’m curious about questions, resulting in productive reasoning.

Like why the removal of a parasite is shunned, shamed and debated?

The vector of said parasite, if treated, would result in less parasites.

This is a logical solution to the problem, and it would save trillions.

(yes, trillions with a T)

Not to mention countless lives, unencumbered by the heavy burden

Of a forced infection rates.

Where did humanity go astray?

Perhaps it was always this way.

Until we reframe the argument.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a website or blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: